ॐ

आख्याहि मे को भवानुग्ररूपो नमोऽस्तु ते देववर प्रसीद। विज्ञातुमिच्छामि भवन्तमाद्यं न हि प्रजानामि तव प्रवृत्तिम्।।11.31।।

ākhyāhi me ko bhavān ugra-rūpo namo ’stu te deva-vara prasīda vijñātum ichchhāmi bhavantam ādyaṁ na hi prajānāmi tava pravṛittim

Sanskrit Chant Recitation
Chapter 11, Verse 31
0:000:00

Scripture Translation Room

Sanskrit to English Translation

Translator:
Tell me, who you are, so fierce of form. I offer my salutations to you, O God Supreme; have mercy on me. I desire to know you, the original Being. I do not indeed know your workings.

A Reading - Rantideb

Why: Arjuna asks directly who Krishna is in this terrible form, and asks for grace, saying he wishes to understand, since he cannot comprehend Krishna's actions, again pairing genuine confusion with a direct, honest request for understanding rather than pretending to already grasp it.

In life: it's more useful to directly ask for understanding when you're genuinely confused about something significant than to quietly pretend you've already grasped it.

Teaching: the next time you're genuinely confused by something significant happening around you, ask directly for understanding, the way Arjuna does here, rather than performing comprehension you don't actually have.

ākhyāhitell
meme
kaḥwho
bhavānyou
ugra-rūpaḥfierce form
namaḥ astuI bow
teto you
deva-varaGod of gods
prasīdabe merciful
vijñātumto know
ichchhāmiI wish
bhavantamyou
ādyamthe primeval
nanot
hibecause
prajānāmicomprehend
tavayour
pravṛittimworkings

Deep Classical Commentary (Bhashya)

Author:
11.31 आख्याहि tell? मे me? कः who (art)? भवान् Thou? उग्ररूपः fierce in form? नमः salutation? अस्तु be? ते to Thee? देववर O God Supreme? प्रसीद have mercy? विज्ञातुम् to know? इच्छामि (I) wish? भवन्तम् Thee? आद्यम् the original Being? न not? हि indeed? प्रजानामि (I) know? तव Thy? प्रवृत्तिम् doing.No Commentary.